ArticleCase reports in pediatrics2026
A Case of Misdiagnosed Pediatric Congenital Nephrogenic Diabetes Insipidus due to AQP2 Variants.
Article in Case reports in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Congenital nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (CNDI) is a rare disorder of renal water handling, often presenting in early infancy with severe polyuria and hypernatremia. Differentiating CNDI from central diabetes insipidus (CDI) remains challenging, and delayed identification may result in inappropriate therapy, leading to adverse growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Case Presentation: We present the case of an 8-month-old male infant with a history of suspected CDI since birth. He was treated with desmopressin (dDAVP) without clinical benefit. The absence of the posterior pituitary bright spot at magnetic resonance imaging supported the CDI diagnosis. Considering persistent polyuria with recurrent episodes of hypernatremia and low urine osmolality, a diagnosis of CNDI was proposed, and plasma copeptin (CP) levels were determined. Measurement of CP showed markedly increased concentrations, suggesting renal tubular resistance to vasopressin. dDAVP therapy was discontinued and patient's management was adjusted to include hydrochlorothiazide therapy and a high-calorie diet restricted in sodium and protein. The patient showed progressive clinical improvement with reduction of polyuria and stabilization of serum sodium levels, although linear growth delay persisted. A final diagnosis of CNDI was confirmed by molecular analysis that identified rare compound heterozygous variants in the AQP2 gene, c.85G > A variant (maternal) and c.553C > G (paternal). Conclusions: This case highlights the diagnostic pitfalls of CNDI in infancy and underscores the pivotal role of early CP assessment and molecular genetic testing in distinguishing CNDI from CDI. Prompt recognition of CNDI is essential to avoid ineffective dDAVP therapy and to initiate a targeted multidisciplinary approach. Rare
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.