ArticleBMJ public health2026
Obstetric emergency readiness in rural emergency departments: a cross-sectional survey of birthing and non-birthing hospitals in Montana, USA.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rural emergency departments (EDs) increasingly serve as frontline providers of obstetric care due to widespread closures of labour and delivery (L&D) units. Building on a prior study that assessed hospital-level obstetric readiness using the WHO Emergency Obstetric Care (EmOC) Indicators, this study evaluates ED-specific preparedness for obstetric emergencies in a rural US state, with implications for similar settings globally. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Autumn 2024 involving ED medical and nursing staff from both birthing and non-birthing hospitals. The survey assessed hospital characteristics, staffing and nine domains related to emergency obstetric care. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise responses from 78 individuals across 45 EDs. Selected comparisons between birthing and non-birthing facilities were evaluated using Fisher's exact tests. Results: Most participating hospitals (87%) were in rural areas. Half of the EDs were in non-birthing facilities, many of which had previously had L&D units that closed. Key findings included inconsistent pregnancy screening and triage protocols, limited staff training and inadequate ED discharge and transport procedures. EDs frequently managed early pregnancy complications, postpartum emergencies and, in some cases, active labour and delivery. Conclusions: Rural EDs function as critical safety nets but demonstrate important gaps in emergency preparedness, workforce readiness and transport systems. This assessment framework provides a practical approach for identifying facility-level vulnerabilities and informing targeted quality improvement, simulation training, referral-network strengthening and policy interventions. Readiness assessments such as this may help health systems improve preparedness for high-acuity, low frequency emergencies and promote equitable access to emergency care in rural and underserved communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.