Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42851878›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026

Functional Outcome of Operative Titanium Elastic Nailing System Versus Non-Operative Figure-of-Eight Bandage in Displaced Mid-Shaft Clavicle Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Study.

S Balaji, N Ravikumar, V Viswanathan, R Muralidharan, Rumesh Kannan Gunasekaran, Avinash Gogoularadja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S BalajiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.
N RavikumarDepartment of Orthopaedics, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.
V ViswanathanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.
R MuralidharanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.
Rumesh Kannan GunasekaranDepartment of Orthopaedics, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.
Avinash GogoularadjaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Displaced midshaft clavicle fractures are commonly treated either conservatively using a figure-of-eight bandage or operatively with the Titanium Elastic Nailing System (TENS). However, evidence comparing these modalities remains limited. This study compared the functional and radiological outcomes of TENS with conservative management in adults with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled study was conducted over 2 years at the Department of Orthopaedics, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry. Sixty adults with Allman Group I displaced midshaft clavicle fractures were randomized into TENS (n = 30) and figure-of-eight bandage (n = 30) groups. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Constant-Murley Score and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Radiological union, complications, return to activity, and patient satisfaction were also evaluated. Results: Fifty-eight patients completed follow-up. The TENS group demonstrated significantly better early functional recovery with lower DASH scores at 6 weeks (59.55 ± 3.55 vs. 65.12 ± 4.72; P < 0.001), while Constant-Murley scores were higher but not significantly different. At 6 months, both groups achieved comparable Constant scores (96.48 ± 1.68 vs. 96.46 ± 2.85; P = 0.857) and low DASH scores. Fracture union was achieved in all patients, with slightly earlier radiological union and earlier return to activity (9.6 vs. 10.8 weeks) in the TENS group. Minor implant-related complications occurred following TENS but did not influence the outcome. Patient satisfaction was high in both groups. Conclusion: TENS provides superior early functional recovery, earlier return to daily activities, and high patient satisfaction compared with figure-of-eight bandage treatment, while both treatment modalities achieve excellent fracture union and comparable long-term functional outcomes. The treatment should be individualized according to patient characteristics, fracture pattern, and functional demands.

Indexed as

Clavicle fractureconservative managementConstant–Murley scoredisabilities of the armfigure-of-eight bandagefunctional outcomeintramedullary fixationMidshaft clavicle fracturerandomized controlled trialshoulder and hand scoretitanium elastic nailing system

Identifiers

PMID42851878
PMCPMC13646566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.