ArticleACS omega2026
Enhancing Solubility Predictions of Plastic Additives in Depolymerization Solvents Using Quantum Chemical Conformer Analysis and COSMO-RS.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The success of recycling plastics by means of depolymerization requires the selective purification of regenerated monomers from complex mixtures. This can be assisted by accurate prediction of the phase behavior of large, flexible, and multifunctional additive molecules, which remains a challenge for current thermodynamic models. In this study, the solubility of 11 representative additives and three PET monomers was measured in two common depolymerization solvents, water and ethylene glycol, covering a wide range from practically insoluble (<1 ppm) to 41.6 wt %. To benchmark predictive capabilities, a quantum-chemistry workflow was investigated, integrating RDKit conformer generation, Gaussian DFT optimizations, and COSMO-RS thermodynamic modeling. Systematic conformer sampling proved critical for bulky, high-molecular-weight additives such as antioxidants. A comparison of three Pople-type basis sets revealed a trade-off between computational cost and accuracy. The 6-311++G-(d,p) basis set provided the best balance (RMSE = 1.31 log units), while 3-21+G-(d) reduced computational cost at lower accuracy, and 6-311++G-(3df,3pd) yielded only minor improvements for select cases at significantly higher cost. Prediction accuracy was highest for more soluble compounds but decreased with increasing molecular weight, conformational flexibility, and Gibbs free energy of fusion. To improve solid-liquid equilibrium predictions, melting points and fusion enthalpies were measured using DSC and compared with QSPR estimates. This combined computational-experimental approach supports the development of energy-efficient purification strategies in chemical recycling of condensation polymers such as PET.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.