Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42851845›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Multiscale Pore-Fracture Reconstruction and Seepability Enhancement of Coal by Hydraulic Fracturing: A Field-Laboratory Integrated Investigation.

Jianbin Liu, Xijian Li, Shoukun Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jianbin LiuMining College, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Xijian LiMining College, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4649-8954
Shoukun ChenMining College, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clarifying the transformation mechanism of hydraulic fracturing on coal-rock pore-fracture structures and the associated seepage response is fundamental to the efficient development of low-permeability coalbed methane reservoirs. However, existing studies are hindered by a disconnect between field observations and laboratory evaluations, and the use of single characterization methods fails to capture the full-scale pore structures. To address these limitations, this study establishes a novel multiscale comparative framework that integrates primary coal, field-fractured coal, and laboratory-simulated fractured coal. This systematic approach was not previously implemented. A comprehensive suite of characterization techniques, including scanning electron microscopy, high-pressure mercury intrusion, low-temperature nitrogen adsorption, carbon dioxide adsorption, nuclear magnetic resonance, and overburden-pressure pore permeability measurements, is employed to elucidate the fracturing-induced alterations across the full pore size spectrum. The cross-scale fractal dimension evolution is quantitatively characterized, seepage differences among sample groups are compared, and the laboratory simulation method is rigorously validated against field-fractured samples. The results demonstrate that hydraulic fracturing shifts the pore structure from micropore-dominated to mesopore-macropore synergistic development with substantial enhancement of meso- and macropores. Meanwhile, stress-induced irreversible collapse of key adsorption micropores of 0.5 to 0.6 nm leads to a reduction in the CO

Identifiers

PMID42851845
PMCPMC13647344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.