ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Iatrogenic coronary artery dissection: detection, management, and prevention.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become a cornerstone treatment for symptomatic coronary artery disease. Although generally safe and effective, PCI may still lead to serious complications such as coronary artery dissection or vessel perforation. Coronary artery dissection can arise spontaneously or be triggered by catheter-based procedures, the latter referred to as iatrogenic coronary artery dissection (ICAD). ICAD, while uncommon, carries significant procedural and prognostic implications; catheter-induced ostial dissection has been reported in approximately 0.09% of coronary angiographic procedures, while 30-day mortality reached 20.8% in a high-risk surgical cohort of patients with PCI-related coronary injuries. Given the increasing use of coronary interventions and the complexity of contemporary lesions, early recognition and accurate characterization of ICAD have become critical. Advances in intravascular imaging-particularly intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography-have improved the ability to identify dissection morphology, understand underlying mechanisms, and guide real-time management. Furthermore, accumulating evidence highlights the role of patient characteristics, lesion anatomy, catheter/device interactions, and procedural techniques in shaping ICAD risk. This narrative review integrates current knowledge on the classification, imaging features, risk determinants, management strategies, and prevention of ICAD, providing a structured framework to support safer and more precise coronary intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.