Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42851810›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

A Hidden Triple Threat: A Case of Concurrent Renal Artery Stenosis, Dissection, and Pseudoaneurysm.

Omkar S Wadekar, Sreedevi T, Gyana Ranjan Pradhan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Omkar S WadekarInternal Medicine, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) Hospital, Bengaluru, IND.
Sreedevi TInternal Medicine, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) Hospital, Bengaluru, IND.
Gyana Ranjan PradhanInternal Medicine, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) Hospital, Bengaluru, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The simultaneous occurrence of renal artery stenosis, pseudoaneurysm, and dissection in a single native vessel is rare and poses a severe threat to renal survival. Herein, we present a case of a 50-year-old male patient on alternative medications for hypertension who presented with a three-day history of vomiting, dehydration, and 12 hours of anuria. Initially managed for dehydration and acute kidney injury, his persistent hypertension and worsening renal function prompted further investigation. Initial renal artery Doppler did not show acute changes; the patient's clinical status necessitated hemodialysis. A re-evaluation, prompted by undisclosed family history and a neglected history of a small left kidney since childhood, led to a repeat Doppler and subsequent CT renal angiogram. Findings revealed right renal artery stenosis, dissection, and a pseudoaneurysm. Urgent percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) successfully restored perfusion, resolving the patient's renal failure and dialysis dependency. This case underscores that renal artery Doppler is highly operator-dependent and can miss critical pathologies. It highlights the necessity of maintaining a high index of suspicion for renovascular causes in hypertensive patients and emphasizes that when clinical findings are incongruent with initial imaging, further invasive diagnostic imaging is essential to ensure timely intervention.

Indexed as

acute kidney injury (aki)percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (ptra)renal artery dissectionrenal artery dopplerrenal artery pseudoaneurysmrenal artery stenosissecondary hypertension

Identifiers

PMID42851810
PMCPMC13646519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.