SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026
The safety and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy in solid malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has achieved remarkable success in hematologic malignancies, prompting its exploration in solid tumors. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of CAR-T therapy for solid tumor treatment. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science from database inception to June 1, 2026, for clinical studies evaluating CAR-T therapy in solid tumors. Primary outcomes included the incidence of any-grade and grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs); secondary outcomes were the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). This review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024549048). Results: 52 studies with 712 patients were enrolled in our study. Lymphopenia (70%, grade≥3: 48%) was the most common adverse event. The pooled ORR and DCR were 13% (95%CI: 11-16%) and 63% (95%CI: 59-67%), respectively. Subgroup analysis indicated that the incidence of hematologic toxicity was significantly higher in patients who had received lymphodepletion, and intravenous delivery was associated with a higher risk of several AEs. Patients who had undergone lymphodepletion (LD) achieved higher ORR (p = 0.0002) and DCR (p = 0.0083). In comparison to regional delivery, intravenous infusion was associated with higher ORR (p = 0.0345). Conclusion: CAR-T therapy demonstrates an acceptable safety profile for solid tumors. While lymphodepletion and intravenous delivery correlate with higher ORR and DCR, they also increase adverse event risks. Balancing therapeutic benefits and safety concerns therefore remains a critical consideration for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.