Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42851755›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Crisis management and relational work in Swiss nursing homes during COVID-19: a qualitative multistakeholder study.

Nathalie Heinz, Settimio Monteverde, Sophie Stephan, Andreas Plate, Stefan Neuner-Jehle, Oliver Senn, Daniel Drewniak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathalie HeinzInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2070-5938
Settimio MonteverdeInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7041-2663
Sophie StephanInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0869-5826
Andreas PlateInstitute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6143-5479
Stefan Neuner-JehleInstitute of Primary Care, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Oliver SennInstitute of Primary Care, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4422-7250
Daniel DrewniakInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich Faculty of Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic confronted nursing homes across countries as they sought to prevent the spread of the virus among residents, placing substantial strain on the different stakeholder groups in healthcare. This study examines how key stakeholders of nursing homes experienced and enacted pandemic governance and how these experiences shaped organisational dynamics, relational work and preparedness for future crises. Methods: An exploratory qualitative study design was used to collect data in Switzerland between August 2024 and February 2025 across ten cantons in German-speaking and French-speaking regions. 24 semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted with stakeholders from medicine, nursing and management as well as residents' next of kin. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Braun and Clarke six-phase thematic approach. The findings were interpreted using an epistemological approach and discussed with Joan Tronto's ethics of care in order to illuminate relational and democratic dimensions of governance. Results: Three overarching themes were identified: (1) crisis governance under sustained uncertainty, (2) organisational strain and expanded relational labour and (3) selective learning and persistent gaps in preparedness. Pandemic management was characterised by the continuous local translation of rapidly changing public health directives, decentralised responsibility and the limited usefulness of formal emergency plans. Prolonged crisis conditions led to cumulative organisational strain, increased leadership pressure and heightened relational labour, particularly in communication and negotiation with next of kin. While adaptations such as infection-control workflows, vaccination logistics and testing routines improved over time, psychosocial, interpersonal and ethical dimensions remained insufficiently integrated, resulting in a fragmented process of institutional learning. Conclusions: Pandemic preparedness in nursing homes extends beyond technical readiness and formal protocols: effective crisis management depended on relational labour and the local adaptation of general guidelines. Future preparedness should integrate relational, participatory and psychosocial capacities alongside infection prevention and control measures. Reporting method: (The Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research (COREQ) checklist was followed.).

Indexed as

COVID-19ethicsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID42851755
PMCPMC13646948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.