ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026
Dynamic Computed Tomography Evaluation of Patellar Tracking Following Unrestricted Kinematic Versus Mechanical Alignment in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Restoration of physiological knee kinematics has become an important objective in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Unrestricted kinematic alignment (KA) has been proposed as an alternative to conventional mechanical alignment (MA) to better reproduce native knee anatomy and improve patellofemoral biomechanics. This study compared post-operative patellar tracking and clinical outcomes between unrestricted KA and standard MA using dynamic computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted among 50 patients with primary end-stage knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary TKA at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Patients were equally allocated into unrestricted KA (n = 25) and MA (n = 25) groups. Dynamic CT was performed postoperatively to assess patellar tracking, patellar tilt, and patellar translation. Functional outcomes were evaluated using Knee Society Score (KSS), functional KSS, post-operative range of motion (ROM), anterior knee pain, and complications. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 26.0, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups (P > 0.05). Normal patellar tracking was significantly more frequent in the KA group than the MA group (92.0% vs. 72.0%; P = 0.043). Mean patellar tilt (5.1 ± 2.0° vs. 8.4 ± 2.8°; P < 0.001) and patellar translation (2.8 ± 1.1 mm vs. 4.5 ± 1.6 mm; P < 0.001) were significantly lower following KA. Patients undergoing KA achieved significantly higher post-operative KSS (90.6 ± 5.4 vs. 84.8 ± 6.3; P = 0.001), functional KSS (88.7 ± 6.1 vs. 82.9 ± 6.8; P = 0.002), and ROM (122.6 ± 8.5° vs. 115.3 ± 9.6°; P = 0.007). Anterior knee pain was significantly less frequent in the KA group (24.0% vs. 52.0%; P = 0.038), whereas post-operative complications were comparable between groups (P = 0.293). Conclusion: Unrestricted KA provides superior patellofemoral biomechanics, improved functional outcomes, and reduced anterior knee pain compared with standard MA without increasing post-operative complications. Dynamic CT is a valuable modality for objectively assessing post-operative patellar kinematics following TKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.