Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42851690›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Research on liquidity and valuation risk assessment of art financial assets based on deep learning.

Ziwen Jiang, Jingzhou Zhao, Jiamin Yao, Zehao Bian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ziwen JiangXuBeihong Art Academy, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China.
Jingzhou ZhaoXuBeihong Art Academy, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China.
Jiamin YaoCollege of Information Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China.
Zehao BianXuBeihong Art Academy, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Art is increasingly recognized as an alternative asset class in wealth management. However, its non-standardized nature renders it difficult to treat on a par with conventional financial assets. Valuation risk arises from subjective pricing and expert bias, while liquidity risk is manifested in high auction failure rates. These challenges are difficult to address adequately with traditional linear econometric models. This study proposes a multimodal deep learning framework that integrates painting images, historical transaction data, artist reputation, and macroeconomic indicators. A ResNet-50 network, initialized on ImageNet and subsequently adapted to the artwork domain, serves as the visual encoder, while a multi-layer perceptron processes structured tabular variables; the two representations are combined in a fusion layer. The framework simultaneously performs two risk-assessment tasks: valuation deviation regression and unsold-lot binary classification. The model is estimated on 96,314 modern and contemporary auction lots offered between 2000 and 2023, of which 27.8% went unsold, using a strictly chronological training, validation, and test partition. The empirical results demonstrate that the proposed multimodal framework outperforms traditional benchmarks, including ordinary least squares (OLS), logistic regression, and random forests. The model achieves an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.891 for liquidity risk prediction. It reduces the Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) for valuation deviation by 32.9% compared to OLS. Ablation studies confirm that visual embeddings provide substantial incremental information beyond what can be attributed to increased model complexity alone, and permutation importance combined with linear probing shows that the visual representation encodes stylistic period, subject type, chromatic intensity, and compositional complexity-the properties through which visual content is theorized to affect market outcomes. Robustness checks further delineate the model's performance boundaries under macroeconomic shocks. This study translates the aesthetic heterogeneity of non-standard assets into quantifiable risk signals. It offers financial institutions a data-calibrated basis for adjusting dynamic loan-to-value ratios and assists art funds in optimizing portfolio allocation.

Indexed as

art financeasset pricingliquidity riskmultimodal deep learningvaluation risk

Identifiers

PMID42851690
PMCPMC13646155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.