Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42851682›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

Designing healthcare transformation: a hybrid model between the hospital and home for high-risk pregnant women.

Nirit Putievsky Pilosof, Rakefet Yoeli-Ullman, Shlomi Toussia-Cohen, Esther Galler, Galia Barkai, Eyal Zimlichman, Abraham Tsur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nirit Putievsky PilosofColler School of Management, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Rakefet Yoeli-UllmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Shlomi Toussia-CohenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Esther GallerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Galia BarkaiSheba Beyond Virtual Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Eyal ZimlichmanARC Innovation at Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Abraham TsurARC Innovation at Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Healthcare organizations are developing hybrid models of care between the hospital and home using remote technologies for monitoring and communication, aiming to transform their healthcare service. While most programs focus on technology integration and adaptation, or on clinical safety and quality, sustainable healthcare transformation requires a system design approach that coordinates change across human, technological, and spatial dimensions. This study investigates a novel hybrid model for women with high-risk pregnancy, offering an alternative to prolonged hospital stays. The model enables home hospitalization through intensive telemonitoring and daily remote clinical encounters, complemented by twice-weekly in-person hospital assessment by the same clinical team. Advanced telemedicine technologies enable women to perform essential maternal and fetal assessments at home under remote guidance, whereas inpatient visits support evaluations that are not yet feasible remotely. The People-Process-Place (3P) framework, which conceptualizes healthcare systems as dynamic configurations of social actors, care processes, and physical and digital places, provides a useful lens for examining the hybrid model as a form of healthcare transformation that simultaneously reshapes human roles, organizational workflows, and care environments. Methods: The qualitative study, based on observations and forty interviews of patients, staff, management, and technology directors, examines the transformation of the hybrid model of care by adopting the People-Process-Place (3P) framework to analyze the multidimensional change. Results: The findings demonstrate transformation across all dimensions of the People-Process-Place framework. The hybrid model reshaped professional practice, enhanced patient autonomy, and increased family involvement (People), thereby expanding relational continuity of care. It reconfigured the patient journey, introduced new patterns of technology use, redefined organizational policies and advanced economic models (Process), and expanded care across hospital and home settings, with physical and digital environments provided in diverse locations (Place). At the intersection of People-Process-Place lay safety, trust, and experience, which affect the system's flexibility and ability to manage challenges and scale. Conclusions: The study presents a design framework for healthcare transformation to examine the intersection of human, technological, and spatial change. The case of the hybrid model for high-risk pregnant women demonstrated the complexity of transformation and the need for a design framework to evaluate and develop change processes.

Indexed as

digital transformationhealthcare designhigh-risk pregnant womenhospital at homehybrid modelpeople-process-place (3P) frameworkremote caretele-monitoring

Identifiers

PMID42851682
PMCPMC13646079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.