Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42851669›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026

Synthetic microbial community to enhance the fermentation and feed valorization of pineapple waste.

Kuanmin Yang, Ju Qin, Xiaoqiang Xue, Guozhao Lin, Kaiyong Huang, Dongdi Gu, Jiliang Su, Jun Wang, Yiyan Cui, Xianyong Ma and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Kuanmin YangShenzhen Kingkey Smart Agriculture Times Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Ju QinInstitute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Animal Meat Quality and Safety Control and Evaluation, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoqiang XueShenzhen Kingkey Smart Agriculture Times Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Guozhao LinShenzhen Kingkey Smart Agriculture Times Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Kaiyong HuangShenzhen Kingkey Smart Agriculture Times Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Dongdi GuShenzhen Kingkey Smart Agriculture Times Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Jiliang SuShenzhen Kingkey Smart Agriculture Times Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Jun WangShenzhen Kingkey Smart Agriculture Times Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Yiyan CuiInstitute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Animal Meat Quality and Safety Control and Evaluation, Guangzhou, China.
Xianyong MaInstitute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Animal Meat Quality and Safety Control and Evaluation, Guangzhou, China.
Zhimei TianInstitute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Animal Meat Quality and Safety Control and Evaluation, Guangzhou, China.
Miao YuInstitute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Animal Meat Quality and Safety Control and Evaluation, Guangzhou, China.
Zhichang LiuInstitute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Animal Meat Quality and Safety Control and Evaluation, Guangzhou, China.
Ting RongInstitute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Animal Meat Quality and Safety Control and Evaluation, Guangzhou, China.
Yusheng LuInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Ruqing ZhongInstitute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiangdong LiuGuangxi Yangxiang Co., Ltd., Guangxi, China.
Pan YangInstitute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Animal Meat Quality and Safety Control and Evaluation, Guangzhou, China.
Dun DengShenzhen Kingkey Smart Agriculture Times Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global livestock industry is confronted with severe feed-supply pressure, and valorizing agro-industrial by-products has become a promising way to alleviate feed resource shortages. Large quantities of pineapple waste are produced annually during pineapple processing, but antinutritional factors greatly limit its direct application in pig diets. Pineapple waste (PW) is a promising agro-industrial by-product for feed production; however, its high levels of antinutritional factors and structural carbohydrates limit its utilization in monogastric animals. This study aimed to develop a synthetic microbial community (SysComs) for upgrading PW into a functional feed ingredient. Four functional strains were separately screened according to their dominant single degrading or metabolite-synthesizing traits, and further combined into a synthetic community owing to their complementary metabolic capacities, including tannin-degrading

Indexed as

anti-nutritional factors degradationfermentationfermented pineapple wastepigssynthetic microbial community

Identifiers

PMID42851669
PMCPMC13646722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.