Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42851622›Full record

ArticleRendiconti Lincei. Scienze fisiche e naturali2026

Volcano-climate interactions: reframing the volcano-climate puzzle.

Davide Zanchettin, Kameswar Rao Modali, Lauren Marshall, Shih-Wei Fang, Stergios Misios, Francesco S R Pausata, Angelo Rubino, Claudia Timmreck, Vito Zago

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze fisiche e naturali, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Davide ZanchettinDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, University Ca'Foscari of Venice, Mestre, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5929-6983
Kameswar Rao ModaliDeutsches Klimarechenzentrum GmbH (DKRZ), Hamburg, Germany.
Lauren MarshallSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Shih-Wei FangCollege of Earth Sciences, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Stergios MisiosResearch Centre for Atmospheric Physics and Climatology, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Francesco S R PausataDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, QC Canada.
Angelo RubinoDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, University Ca'Foscari of Venice, Mestre, Italy.
Claudia TimmreckMax Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany.
Vito ZagoIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia - Osservatorio Etneo, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Explosive volcanic eruptions are major natural perturbations of the Earth system. By increasing stratospheric aerosol loading, they exert a dual radiative forcing: enhanced scattering of incoming solar radiation induces global surface cooling, while absorption of terrestrial radiation warms the lower stratosphere. Together, these radiative perturbations trigger complex dynamical responses within the coupled ocean-atmosphere-sea ice system, leading to diverse regional impacts. The resulting climate impacts are strongly event-specific, depending not only on the eruption's magnitude, location, and timing, but also on the prevailing climate state and the phase of intrinsic variability. In this Perspective, we use the early nineteenth-century volcanic cluster-dominated by the unidentified 1809 eruption and the 1815 Mount Tambora eruption-as a natural test case to assess recent progress in volcano-climate research. We review and reassess advances in volcanic source characterization, aerosol forcing, climate response, and attribution, using new analyses of this volcanic cluster to illustrate how uncertainties propagate across these interconnected components. Taken together, recent advances indicate that volcanic climate impacts cannot be understood as deterministic responses to forcing alone, but emerge from the interplay between forcing characteristics, internal variability, and state-dependent feedbacks. We identify key remaining bottlenecks and outline future research directions, emphasizing the role of high-resolution modeling, data assimilation, AI-based methods and emulators, and probabilistic frameworks to drive further progress. Finally, we argue that addressing the volcano-climate puzzle will require coordinated engagement across the geoscience community to better constrain volcano-climate interactions, with the long-term goal of fully integrating volcanic forcing into Earth system science. Graphical abstract:

Indexed as

Earth system modelsNatural climate variabilityPaleoclimate reconstructionsVolcanic eruptionsVolcanic stratospheric aerosol

Identifiers

PMID42851622
PMCPMC13645875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.