Trial reportFrontiers in public health2026
A randomized controlled study comparing three food prescription programs for older adults: program design, implementation, and utilization.
Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Food prescriptions can help address food insecurity, however older adults have unique barriers to food prescription utilization, including transportation, that threaten program effectiveness. This research compares utilization of two delivered food prescription programs with a standard of care control. Design: Participants were randomized to be offered one of three 12-week free food prescriptions: (1) Home-Delivered Produce Prescription: a customizable fresh produce box, (2) Home-Delivered Meal Kits: an equivalent amount of produce plus complementary food items to make three recipes, or (3) Mobile Market Produce Prescription (control): a voucher to use at local mobile market. Prescription redemption and produce usage were reported on weekly phone or text surveys. Setting: Mobile market or home delivery. Participants: Patients aged 65 and older from hospital-based primary care clinics with difficulty accessing fresh fruits and vegetables ( Results: There were no statistically significant differences in enrollment rates across arms: 84.6% in produce prescription ( Conclusion: While redemption rates were higher in both delivery arms, the meal kit did not improve produce usage above control, suggesting that delivery had the most impact on food prescription utilization among older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.