ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Metabolic-epigenetic imprinting of macrophages in endometriosis: a working model for lesion persistence and treatment.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent inflammatory disorder that often persists or returns even after visible lesions have been removed. The behavior of peritoneal macrophages may help explain this clinical durability. These cells participate in lesion implantation, vascularization, fibrosis, defective immune clearance, and pain, but it is uncertain why disease-supporting phenotypes are maintained. We argue that repeated exposure to the endometriotic niche may leave macrophages with a metabolically conditioned epigenetic memory rather than only a short-lived polarization state. Lactate, succinate, iron, oxysterols, and glutamine-derived metabolites could alter cellular metabolism while also providing substrates, cofactors, or inhibitors for chromatin-modifying enzymes. Histone lactylation and TET/JmjC-regulated methylation states are plausible molecular records of this exposure, although neither has yet been followed from metabolite to persistent mark and macrophage function in human disease. At present, the most direct endometriosis-specific support comes from a TGF-β1/CCL2-induced TET3 program associated with let-7 repression, inflammatory cytokine production, and macrophage survival. Other proposed circuits, including lactate-lactylation coupling and macrophage-stromal exchange of glycolytic signals, remain incomplete. This distinction matters: established findings support parts of the model, but not yet the entire causal chain. A memory state should be experimentally identifiable by its persistence after stimulus withdrawal, transferability, metabolic dependence, and reversibility. If experiments satisfy these criteria, the retained macrophage state would become a plausible non-hormonal target. The relevant test would be whether changing that state produces a lasting loss of lesion-supporting function instead of a brief reduction in downstream inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.