ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
English vowel identification in noise shows reduced native-language influence: a behavioral study using machine-learning analysis of Chinese children.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Non-native listeners experience greater difficulty perceiving second-language (L2) speech in noise, yet whether first-language (L1) phonological skills continue to support L2 perception under adverse acoustic conditions remains unclear. Methods: We examined English back-vowel identification in 52 Chinese fifth- ( Results: Sixth graders outperformed fifth graders across conditions, but the grade advantage decreased as noise increased, with accuracy differences of 13.30%, 9.80%, and 3.20%, respectively. Chinese vowel identification significantly predicted English vowel identification in quiet but showed no significant predictive association under either noise condition. Random forest analyses complemented the specified linear model by revealing nonlinear predictive patterns, including a grade-by-noise interaction not detected by the linear model in this sample. These exploratory findings should be interpreted cautiously given the modest sample size ( Discussion: The findings suggest that the association between quiet-measured L1 vowel identification and L2 vowel identification is context-dependent and attenuates under noisy listening conditions. They also indicate that grade-related advantages diminish as acoustic difficulty increases, while machine-learning analyses may provide complementary information about predictive patterns without establishing underlying cognitive mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.