ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026
Comparative effectiveness and safety of topiramate versus amitriptyline for the prophylactic management of chronic migraine: a prospective comparative study.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic migraine is a chronic disabling neurological disease and has a significant impact on quality of life. Topiramate and amitriptyline are commonly used for migraine prevention, but treatment decisions should consider their effectiveness and safety profiles. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of topiramate and amitriptyline in chronic migraine. Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental study at a specialised healthcare facility in Lahore, Pakistan, over a one-year period from March 2023 to March 2024. A total of 330 patients meeting the ICHD-3 criteria for chronic migraine were enrolled, including group (a) 165 patients treated with topiramate and group (b) 165 treated with amitriptyline. We used monthly headache frequency and the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score to measure headache frequency and headache-related disability at baseline and at Weeks 4, 8, and 12. Adverse events were noted during the study period. We analysed the data using independent-samples t-tests, paired-samples t-tests, and the Chi-Square test, respectively. Results: The mean age of both groups (a) and (b) was 32.37 ± 8.48 years and 34.49 ± 9.02 years, respectively. Both treatments effectively decreased headache frequency and HIT-6 scores during the 12-week follow-up. Mean headache frequency was significantly reduced in group (a) vs. group (b) at week 12 (0.85 ± 0.63 vs. 1.22 ± 0.81 headache days per month, respectively, Conclusion: Topiramate and amitriptyline both were effective in decreasing headache frequency and headache-related disability among chronic migraine patients. Topiramate was slightly more effective and better tolerated than amitriptyline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.