ArticleEvolutionary applications2026
Machine-Learning Models Trained on Genomic Summary Statistics Assess Extinction Risk and Recovery Potential of Bottlenecked Populations.
Article in Evolutionary applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forecasting extinction risk from genomic data is challenging because of interactions among environment, demography, and genomic erosion. Here, we use known outcomes from forward simulations as a proof-of-concept study to test whether machine-learning (ML) models can discriminate relative extinction risk and recovery potential from genomic summary statistics, and identify the most informative predictors. Using individual-based, forward-in-time simulations, we generated genomic and fitness data for 11,200 populations across 112 demographic parameter combinations (ancestral population size: 100-10,000, bottleneck size: 4-50, fecundity: 8-64). We evaluated populations at three time points relative to bottleneck onset: 100 years before, 10 years before and at onset. We then assessed their subsequent fate up to 200 years after the end of the bottleneck, classifying populations as extinct or recovered. From 10 sampled individuals per population, we derived 738 predictors spanning diversity, heterozygosity, genetic/realised/masked load, and ROH-based inbreeding (FROH). Unsupervised analyses primarily captured historical demography and did not separate outcomes. In contrast, supervised models achieved high performance at bottleneck onset, correctly predicting population fate (i.e., future extinction or recovery) from genomics alone with ≈86%-87% accuracy. However, extinction was harder to predict correctly than recovery because simulated extinctions were rarer. Bottleneck size and fecundity provided strong baseline predictability, with genomics adding modest but complementary information. The upper-quantile ROH/FROH summaries were consistently more informative than mean diversity or mean load. A complementary single-genome analysis showed that reference-genome-style summaries retain useful signal when demographic information is sparse. Together, these results highlight the promise of ML-informed extinction-risk assessment to translate genomic indicators into more actionable, early-warning signals for biodiversity conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.