Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42851549›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

A simulation study of differentially private federated learning with zero-trust policy screening for medical IoT devices.

Ihssan S Masad, Ali Mohammad Alqudah, Shoroq Qazan, Sultan Shoaib

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ihssan S MasadDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Gulf University for Science and Technology (GUST), Hawally, Kuwait.
Ali Mohammad AlqudahLucidya Tech LTD, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Shoroq QazanLucidya Tech LTD, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Sultan ShoaibDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Gulf University for Science and Technology (GUST), Hawally, Kuwait.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is increasingly used in connected medical-device systems for physiological-signal classification and continuous monitoring. This paper presents a simulation study of the learning and policy layers of a zero-trust federated-learning framework for Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) devices. The implemented prototype combines federated averaging, Gaussian perturbation of client updates, a device-level trust score, and gradient-magnitude screening of anomalous client updates. This is a simulation study of the federated-learning and zero-trust policy layers; cryptographic, encrypted-transport, and hardware-attestation components are modeled as deployment considerations or overheads and are not implemented as complete physical or protocol-level modules. Using the ECG classification pipeline described in the methodology, we compare centralized training, traditional federated learning, differentially private federated learning, and the proposed zero-trust federated configuration. The proposed ZT-FL configuration is reported at 0.928 accuracy, 0.920 F1-score, and 0.968 AUC. These results support feasibility within the stated simulation scope and do not establish clinical validity, formal end-to-end DP accounting, comprehensive adversarial robustness, regulatory compliance, or post-quantum readiness.

Indexed as

device trust scoringfederated learningGaussian differential-Privacy mechanismgradient-Magnitude anomaly screeninginternet of medical things (IoMT)privacy-preserving machine learningzero-Trust policy engine

Identifiers

PMID42851549
PMCPMC13646169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.