ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Automated assessment of balance function based on a lightweight end-to-end multimodal deep learning framework: predicting Mini-BESTest scores from center of pressure signals in a single stance condition.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Balance dysfunction is a common health issue among older adults and patients with neurological disorders. The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) is a widely used clinical tool for balance assessment. However, its full implementation requires a trained clinician to administer 14 tasks, and the scoring is subject to inter-rater variability. Objective: This study aims to develop an end-to-end, lightweight multimodal deep learning framework (with approximately 55 K parameters) to automatically predict the total Mini-BESTest score and its four subscale scores, utilizing only center of pressure (COP) signals from a single stance condition alongside clinical metadata. Methods: COP signals and clinical metadata from 163 subjects in a public dataset (Santos et al., PeerJ, 2016, 4) were utilized. We proposed a lightweight multimodal deep learning model comprising three dilated convolution branches with varying dilation rates, a channel attention mechanism, and a metadata fusion module. Three independent comparative experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of stance condition, trial number, and time window length on predictive performance. Based on these results, a suitable data configuration was selected for subsequent experiments. An adaptive task weighting scheme based on homoscedastic uncertainty was employed to balance the five regression targets with varying score ranges. Five-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate the models, and out-of-fold (OOF) predictions were constructed to provide a full-sample assessment of predictive performance. Results: Under the selected data configuration (foam surface with eyes open, second trial, first 30 s of data), the five-fold cross-validation mean absolute error (MAE) for the predicted Mini-BESTest total score was 1.971 (out of 28). The full-sample OOF prediction MAE was 1.979, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.758 and R Conclusion: This study demonstrates that an end-to-end deep learning framework can predict the complete Mini-BESTest score from 30 s of quiet standing COP signals under foam surface eyes-open conditions, together with basic clinical metadata. While maintaining predictive accuracy, this lightweight framework (approx. 55 K parameters) may represent a potential direction for future deployment in portable or remote settings, subject to further engineering and clinical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.