ArticleUltrasound (Leeds, England)2026
Supporting obstetric sonographers following diagnostic error: Evidence-informed interventions to promote well-being, learning and patient safety.
Article in Ultrasound (Leeds, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Diagnostic errors in obstetric ultrasound can cause significant harm to patients and are increasingly recognised to have profound emotional and professional consequences for clinicians, described as the second victim phenomenon. An empirical study of obstetric sonographers identified substantial second victim distress and highlighted gaps in preparation, support and organisational response. This paper translates those findings into practical, evidence-informed interventions for clinical practice. Methods: An abductive, pragmatic intervention development approach was used, informed by empirical findings and relevant literature on second victim support, trauma-informed care and just culture. A structured mapping process linked identified gaps in knowledge, skills, policy and resources to proposed intervention components. Results: Three complementary intervention models were developed. Model 1 proposes a supportive learning environment to better prepare sonographers for diagnostic error through education, peer support and structured learning opportunities. Model 2 presents an Ultrasound Manager Second Victim Support Tool to guide consistent and compassionate managerial responses. Model 3 outlines a phase-based early intervention guideline to support timely, trauma-informed responses following diagnostic error, including immediate, follow-up and ongoing support. Conclusion: These models provide a practical framework to support sonographers and ultrasound managers following diagnostic error. By addressing identified gaps in preparation, managerial response and early support, they aim to promote well-being, learning and patient safety, and support the development of just, learning-orientated cultures. Future research should evaluate these interventions in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.