ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Ocular injuries caused by Japanese black bears: a 10-year retrospective analysis of severity and clinical outcomes.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although bear-related injuries are increasing in Japan, ocular trauma associated with Japanese black bear ( Methods: Eight patients who were transported to Fukushima Medical University Hospital for bear-related trauma and subsequently referred to the Department of Ophthalmology for periocular injuries between April 2016 and March 2026 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, location of injury, the presence of globe rupture, extraocular muscle laceration, eyelid laceration, and facial bone fracture, as well as final best-corrected visual acuity, were evaluated. Results: Eight patients (mean age 66.6 ± 20.4 years; seven men and one woman) were included. All patients sustained eyelid lacerations. Open globe injury was observed in four eyes (50%), all classified as rupture. Three were surgically confirmed, and one was diagnosed based on clinical and CT findings without surgical exploration. Three of the four globe ruptures (75%) occurred in mountainous areas, and the remaining case in a rural settlement. Half of the cases (4/8) occurred during the most recent two years (2024-2025). Conclusion: Among bear-related ocular injuries referred to our department over the past 10 years, half involved globe rupture, with the majority occurring in mountainous areas. As bear-related trauma may continue to increase in northern Japan, the establishment of regional management protocols and multidisciplinary collaboration is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.