ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Exploring the knowledge gaps and reporting procedures for adverse events among professional nurses: evidence from Mopani district, Limpopo province, South Africa.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adverse events refer to incidents or mistakes that cause harm to patients due to medical management, rather than being a result of the patient's illness or its complications. These events can occur at any point during the care process. Reporting adverse events is a key strategy in their prevention, and having a clear understanding of what qualifies as an adverse event, along with the correct reporting procedures, is essential for ensuring effective reporting practices. Aim: This study explored the extent to which professional nurses at selected public hospitals in Mopani District, Limpopo Province, South Africa understand adverse events and the reporting procedures of adverse events. Method: A qualitative exploratory-descriptive design was employed. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 26 professional nurses, selected using purposive sampling. Data were analysed thematically using both deductive and Tesch's open coding method. Results: While most participants demonstrated awareness of adverse events and reporting processes, notable knowledge gaps were identified. Some participants did not understand what constitute an adverse event and conflated adverse events with near misses. Additionally, inconsistencies regarding reporting procedures, responsible personnel for reporting and reporting timelines were evident. Conclusion: The study revealed insufficient knowledge among professional nurses regarding adverse events, reporting procedures, and different types of patient safety incidents. To address these gaps, targeted educational interventions and reinforcement of standard operating procedures are recommended to enhance reporting practices and promote patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.