Articlenpj digital surgery2026
Extended KAFR: a kinematic-adaptive paradigm for the efficient analysis of surgical video.
Article in npj digital surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence is increasingly applied to surgical video analysis for phase segmentation, skill assessment, and workflow optimization. A key challenge is the length of surgical recordings, often one to several hours, creating a substantial computational burden. We previously developed Kinematics-Adaptive Frame Recognition (KAFR) for robotic surgery, showing that tracking tool motion effectively identifies informative frames while filtering redundant content. However, laparoscopic surgery introduces additional challenges: manual camera control causes frequent motion artifacts, and image quality is generally lower than robotic systems. This study evaluates whether KAFR generalizes to laparoscopic surgery using the Cholec80 benchmark, comprising 80 laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures annotated for seven surgical phases. KAFR operates in three stages: a fine-tuned YOLO model detects and segments surgical tools; frames are adaptively selected based on tool displacement or velocity variation; and an X3D model classifies selected frames into surgical phases. KAFR achieved a 91.0% F1 score using only 0.58% of frames for phase classification, representing an approximately seven-fold reduction compared to typical 4% frame sampling, while maintaining performance comparable to LoViT (90.2%) and Trans-SVNet (89.7%). These results demonstrate that kinematics-based frame selection transfers effectively to the challenging laparoscopic environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.