ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Beyond symptoms: wearable digital biomarkers for subclinical detection of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is the most prevalent dose-limiting toxicity of taxane-, platinum-, and proteasome inhibitor-based regimens, yet clinical management has a structural flaw: assessment depends on CTCAE clinician grading that registers symptoms only after axonal degeneration has reached an irreversible stage. Main body: Quantitative sensory testing studies demonstrate that vibration perception, thermal detection, and sudomotor function deteriorate before patients report numbness or pain, suggesting a subclinical window of one to two chemotherapy cycles. Whether detection within this window can prevent permanent nerve injury remains biologically plausible but prospectively unestablished. Wearable sensors-inertial measurement units for gait, plantar pressure insoles, electrochemical skin conductance devices, and vibration sensors-have demonstrated proof-of-concept capacity to capture subclinical CIPN signals, but evidence remains largely cross-sectional with limited longitudinal validation. This Perspective distinguishes the conceptual framework for subclinical CIPN surveillance from the currently available clinical validation evidence. I systematically categorize four sensing modalities by neuropathological substrate, provide a cross-modality readiness comparison, and identify translational barriers including absent alert thresholds and confounding factors such as age, diabetes, anemia, and fatigue. I propose a phased prospective validation framework; specific monitoring recommendations should be regarded as hypotheses for testing rather than current clinical guidance. Conclusion: Wearable sensors should not replace patient-reported outcomes but may add an objective neurotoxicity monitoring layer whose capacity to improve clinical outcomes requires prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.