ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Stigma of hearing loss and the use of hearing aids among adults with hearing loss: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study explored stigma associated with hearing loss and hearing aid use among adults in Saudi Arabia. It examined the prevalence of hearing loss stigma (HLS) and hearing aid stigma (HAsS) and their associations with hearing aid use and selected demographic characteristics. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 403 adults with self-reported hearing loss. Participants completed an online questionnaire, distributed through convenience sampling, that included validated instruments assessing HLS, HAsS, and personal distress/inadequacy related to hearing loss. Results: High levels of HLS and HAsS were reported by 50.12% and 82.93% of participants, respectively. Higher HLS levels were significantly associated with hearing aid use, lower educational attainments, unmarried status, lower incomes, greater self-reported hearing loss severity, and a longer duration of hearing loss. Notably, older individuals with lower incomes reported the highest levels of stigma. Among participants medically indicated for hearing aids, higher HAsS was associated with lower odds of hearing aid use, whereas higher HLS was associated with greater odds of use after adjustment for other model covariates. HLS was also strongly associated with personal distress and inadequacy. Conclusions: High levels of HLS and HAsS were observed within the study sample, highlighting stigma as a prominent psychosocial concern. HLS and HAsS showed different associations with hearing aid use, with higher HAsS associated with lower odds of use and higher HLS associated with greater odds of use. These findings highlight the potential importance of addressing stigma within hearing healthcare and support further investigation of approaches to address HL- and HA-related stigma in the Saudi context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.