ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Regulatory flexibility under pressure: an asymmetric brain-body model of leadership in high-stakes teams.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leadership under pressure is often framed as a cognitive challenge, although consequential decisions are made by embodied agents whose cardiovascular, respiratory, autonomic, endocrine, and interoceptive states change with stress. We propose an asymmetric interpersonal brain-body model for high-stakes teams. Contextual demands alter a leader's regulatory state; this state shapes cognitive flexibility, social perception, communication, and action; and leader signals modify the team's regulatory environment and willingness to disclose uncertainty, dissent, revise plans, or withdraw. These responses feed back to the leader. The model builds on established evidence that bodily signals contribute to subjective feeling and decision-making, stress reorganizes large-scale neural processing, and social partners can alter neural and endocrine responses to threat. Its novel claim is narrower: hierarchy makes interpersonal regulation directionally asymmetric, linking brain-body dynamics to information flow and collective decision quality. Regulatory flexibility, i.e., context-sensitive mobilization and recovery, is proposed as more informative than tonic calm or physiological synchrony. A four-region color heuristic is retained as a translation layer, not as a neurobiological taxonomy. We specify competing explanations, failure criteria, and multimodal within-person and team-level designs for testing the framework in high-stakes teams and crisis simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.