Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42851421›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026

From Fragmented Projects to an Integrated, Conflict-Sensitive Reproductive Health System for Women in Somalia.

Anisa Abdullahi Ibrahim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anisa Abdullahi IbrahimDepartment of Health Sciences, Al Hayat Medical University, Mogadishu, Somalia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women and girls in Somalia face reproductive health risks that are intensified by protracted conflict, displacement, climate shocks, poverty and, since 2025, sharp contractions in humanitarian funding. Reproductive healthcare in emergencies is still often reduced to maternal delivery services, although women's needs extend from adolescence through pregnancy, family planning, care after violence, female genital mutilation (FGM)-related care and later reproductive life. This commentary examines the main barriers to reproductive healthcare and proposes health system and policy actions to make care fairer and more continuous for women in Somalia. It is a narrative, policy-oriented synthesis of peer-reviewed studies, national survey analyses and United Nations and government documents, prioritizing evidence from 2020 to 2026. The evidence suggests that access gaps persist not only because services are scarce, but because they are short-term, donor-dependent, designed for settled populations, weakly connected across levels of care, and poorly measured for the women least likely to be reached: displaced, rural, nomadic and adolescent women among them. We argue that Somalia needs one nationally defined, conflict-sensitive reproductive health system, anchored in primary healthcare, protected from funding shocks and accountable to women. Seven priority actions are proposed, with lead actors and indicators. Respectful and confidential care, informed choice and the meaningful participation of women must guide implementation, because reproductive health is central to women's dignity, protection and participation in Somali society.

Indexed as

conflictdisplacementfamily planninghealth systemsmaternal healthreproductive healthSomaliawomen

Identifiers

PMID42851421
PMCPMC13645681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.