ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Artificial Light at Night Alters Both of Nocturnal and Diurnal Pollination Networks in Alpine Meadows.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial light at night (ALAN) is an increasingly pervasive driver of global change that disrupts natural diel rhythms and alters species interactions. However, its effects on plant-pollinator networks across coupled day-night systems remain poorly understood, particularly in environmentally sensitive alpine ecosystems. Here, we conducted a field manipulation experiment in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau, comparing illuminated and unlit conditions, and constructed temporally explicit pollination networks by integrating diurnal and nocturnal interactions. Despite no detectable changes in plant community composition, ALAN significantly restructured pollinator-mediated interactions. At night, visitation by Lepidoptera (primarily moths), the dominant pollinators, declined sharply (-57.5%), coinciding with an overall reduction in visitation frequency (-35.4%) and a substantial decrease in network nestedness (-64.7%). In contrast, Diptera visitation increased markedly (+179.6%), partially offsetting the reduction in total visitation associated with the decline in Lepidoptera visitation. ALAN also increased nocturnal network modularity by 12.8%, indicating greater compartmentalization of nocturnal plant-pollinator interactions. Notably, these effects extended beyond the nocturnal period. During the day, total visitation remained unchanged, but strong shifts in pollinator composition emerged: Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, and Coleoptera declined (-20.0%, -51.8%, and -61.7%, respectively), whereas Diptera increased (+46.3%). These changes were accompanied by a significant increase in network connectance (+16.1%), whereas nestedness and modularity remained unaffected by ALAN. The decline in nocturnal nestedness was primarily driven by reductions in Lepidoptera, whereas the increase in diurnal connectance was associated with increased Diptera visitation and reduced Hymenoptera visitation. Together, our results demonstrate that ALAN reorganizes plant-pollinator networks through differential responses among pollinator groups, with some groups declining while others increase in visitation and cross-diel cascading effects, thereby altering the organization of species interactions across both nocturnal and diurnal pollination systems. Our findings highlight the importance of integrating diel dynamics into ecological network research and underscore the need to mitigate light pollution in vulnerable alpine ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.