Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42851408›Full record

ReviewLandscape ecology2026

Reimagining land system science in seascapes.

Elizabeth O Ruff, Matthew Clark, Lucas Alencar, Katie Devenish, Philip A Loring, Sandy Nofyanza, Johan A Oldekop, Mary A Young, Joshua E Cinner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Landscape ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elizabeth O RuffThriving Oceans Research Hub, School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9189-6655
Matthew ClarkThriving Oceans Research Hub, School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3217-1192
Lucas AlencarGlobal Development Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5021-8348
Katie DevenishGlobal Development Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4278-8513
Philip A LoringGlobal Science Team, The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6039-2331
Sandy NofyanzaGlobal Development Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8671-6418
Johan A OldekopGlobal Development Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0565-812X
Mary A YoungDeakin Marine Science Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7426-2343
Joshua E CinnerThriving Oceans Research Hub, School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2675-9317

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Terrestrial concepts often guide the science and management of marine systems, as exhibited by the influence of landscape ecology on seascape ecology. However, the theoretical assumptions that inform these concepts have not been sufficiently interrogated within the distinct social-ecological realities of seascapes. Objective: We call for a 'sea system science' that navigates the human dimensions of seascape change to advance the study and management of ocean spaces. Methods: We evaluate two terrestrial concepts (intensification and expansion) that underpin common approaches to marine management. We establish key dimensions of theoretical (mis)alignment across agriculture, forestry, hunting, marine aquaculture, and capture fisheries. Results: Seascape uses are substantively different from their landscape counterparts, though there is limited alignment between agriculture and marine aquaculture and between hunting and capture fisheries. We outline opportunities for sea system science to both interrogate terrestrial management concepts and develop an alternative management ontology tailored to seascapes. Conclusions: A sea system science that engages with the human dimensions of seascape change and co-evolves with seascape ecology offers a pathway toward management approaches that are grounded in the social-ecological realities of marine spaces. Without closer attention to these dimensions, seascape ecology risks implementing terrestrial management practices that are procedurally feasible but ecologically and socioeconomically ineffective.

Indexed as

Land-sea analogsOcean ontologiesSeascape ecologySeascape useSea system scienceSocial-ecological systems

Identifiers

PMID42851408
PMCPMC13645946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.