ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Application of wideband tympanometry combined with kempthorne criteria in the diagnosis of otitis media with effusion in adults: a prospective study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To describe clinical and audiological characteristics and evaluate the diagnostic value of wideband tympanometry (WBT) combined with Kempthorne otoscopic features in adults with otitis media with effusion (OME). Methods: A prospective descriptive study with surgical intervention was conducted on 66 ears with clinically suspected OME in patients aged ≥16 years at Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital from June 2024 to October 2025. Kempthorne score >5 was used solely as an eligibility threshold. Clinical examination, rigid otoscopy, pure-tone audiometry, conventional 226-Hz tympanometry, and WBT were performed. Intraoperative middle-ear fluid at myringotomy served as the positive reference standard in 31 operated ears; the remaining 35 non-operated ears were classified as disease-negative without surgical verification (composite reference standard with partial verification). An Results: All enrolled ears had Kempthorne scores >5. Against the 66-ear composite reference dataset (31 fluid-positive, 35 assumed fluid-negative), sensitivity/specificity/AUC were 100.0%/68.2%/0.84 for standard tympanometry, 77.4%/81.8%/0.91 for WBT alone, and 93.5%/86.4%/0.94 for the combined model (McNemar Conclusion: WBT combined with specific Kempthorne morphological features provided complementary morphological and absorbance information in adult OME. However, because standard tympanometry already achieved 100% sensitivity in the operated subset, any apparent advantage of the combined model in specificity, NPV, and AUC is derived largely from the surgically unverified reference-negative subset and must be interpreted with caution in light of severe partial verification bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.