ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
The synthetic position: generative artificial intelligence and the suspension of self-authorship in emerging adulthood.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has been widely treated as an instrumental aid to thought, a faster route to information, drafting, and articulate self-description. This article problematizes that framing and argues that, when enlisted for the intimate work of deciding who to become, conversational artificial intelligence alters the structure of emerging adulthood, not only its content. Working within Dialogical Self Theory, which conceives the self as a society of relatively autonomous I-positions integrated by a promoter position, we propose that a large language model in self-formative dialogue occupies the self as a synthetic position: an interlocutor that is protean (able to voice any position on demand), frictionless (built to accommodate rather than resist), simulated in its counter-positioning (offering the form of opposition without a lived stake), and authored elsewhere (generating positions instead of returning the user's own positions). We argue that these four properties are jointly and reliably present to an extent that is only ever partial in a human other, a combination the existing typology does not anticipate. When habitually enlisted, the synthetic position tends to absorb the integrative authorship the theory assigns to the meta-position and the promoter position, a process we term synthetic promotion, producing a condition we name authorial suspension: a self densely voiced yet un-authored. We render this account as a conceptual model, distinguish authorial suspension from the neighboring constructs with which it might be confused, and translate the mechanism into formal, falsifiable propositions. Chief among them is the prediction that the outcome turns on the structural location the synthetic position is permitted to occupy, not on the volume of use, so that population-level studies indexing use alone should record a washed-out average effect even where the mechanism operates. Taking a recent Chinese graduating cohort as an illustrative case, we specify the measures an empirical test would require and draw implications for constructivist therapy and education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.