Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42851290›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2026

Measuring Professional Competency in School Counselors: Development and Rasch Validation of a Multidimensional Instrument.

Deasy Yunika Khairun, Agus Taufiq, Yusi Riksa Yustiana, Fuja Siti Fujiawati, Maya Nurlita, Sohibun, Kamaliyah Kadir, Mutmainnah, Ibrahim Al Hakim

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Deasy Yunika KhairunGuidance and Counseling, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Serang, Banten, 42111, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9727-5558
Agus TaufiqGuidance and Counseling, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Department of Educational Psychology and Guidance, Bandung, West Java, 40150, Indonesia.
Yusi Riksa YustianaGuidance and Counseling, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Department of Educational Psychology and Guidance, Bandung, West Java, 40150, Indonesia.
Fuja Siti FujiawatiEducational Curriculum, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Serang, Banten, 42111, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7771-2565
Maya NurlitaMathematics Education, Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin, Baubau, Southeast Sulawesi, 93716, Indonesia.
SohibunPhysics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, West Java, 40150, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2756-2348
Kamaliyah KadirMathematics Education, Indonesia University of Education Department of Mathematics Education, Bandung, West Java, 40150, Indonesia.
MutmainnahGuidance and Counseling, Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Enrekang, Enrekang, South Sulawesi, 91712, Indonesia.
Ibrahim Al HakimGuidance and Counseling, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Department of Educational Psychology and Guidance, Bandung, West Java, 40150, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The measurement of professional competency in school counseling remains methodologically constrained by fragmented domain assessment and heavy reliance on classical test theory approaches. There is a critical need for an empirically calibrated instrument that integrates regulatory competency standards with expanded theoretical domains while ensuring measurement precision and structural coherence. This study developed and validated a multidimensional instrument of professional competency for school counselors using Rasch analysis. Methods: A cross-sectional instrumental design was implemented. The instrument was constructed across seven domains: assessment, development of guidance and counseling program, implementation of guidance and counseling services, evaluation of guidance and counseling program, supervision of pre-service counselor training, continuous professional development, and collaborative engagement in co-curricular programs. Seventy-one items were rated on a five-point Likert scale. Data from 93 practicing school counselors were analyzed using the Rasch Rating Scale Model. Analyses included the evaluation of category functioning, item and person fit statistics, reliability and separation indices, and principal component analysis of residuals (PCAR) to assess construct dimensionality. Results: The Rasch model demonstrated acceptable item fit and ordered rating scale thresholds. The raw variance explained by measures was 53.4%, with 6.7% unexplained variance in the first contrast, indicating a dominant latent construct despite the multidomain theoretical structure. Item difficulty estimates ranged from -1.68 to +1.71 logits, forming a hierarchical continuum from foundational service practices to advanced supervisory and professional roles. Reliability and separation indices indicated stable item calibration and adequate differentiation among levels of professional competency. Conclusions: The findings support the structural validity, hierarchical calibration, and measurement precision of the instrument within a unified Rasch framework. The instrument provides a methodologically robust basis for professional assessment, supervision, and competency-based development in school counseling contexts, with significant potential for further validation across diverse educational systems.

Indexed as

CounselingCounselorsProfessional CompetenceSchoolsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsConstruct ValidityInstrument DevelopmentProfessional CompetencyPsychometric ValidationRasch Measurement ModelSchool Counselors

Identifiers

PMID42851290
PMCPMC13644969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.