Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42851204›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026

Variable spatial management implications based on different seabird distribution and diversity metrics.

Dawn R Barlow, Lisa T Ballance, William L Kennerley, Rachael A Orben, Leigh G Torres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Variable spatial management implications based on different seabird distribution and diversity metrics.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dawn R BarlowMarine Mammal Institute, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Oregon State University, Newport, Oregon, USA.
Lisa T BallanceMarine Mammal Institute, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Oregon State University, Newport, Oregon, USA.
William L KennerleyDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Rachael A OrbenMarine Mammal Institute, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Oregon State University, Newport, Oregon, USA.
Leigh G TorresMarine Mammal Institute, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Oregon State University, Newport, Oregon, USA.

Funding

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management M21PG00011Oregon State University Marine Mammal Institute Gray Whale License Plate ProgramU.S. Department of Energy DE-EE0009800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As resource managers strive to balance marine ecosystem health and services with diverse ocean uses, the spatial and temporal dynamics of species distributions-and their overlap with both static and dynamic human activities-should be carefully considered. Anthropogenic activities and management decisions rarely affect only one species, underscoring the need for spatially and seasonally resolved, multispecies approaches to inform conservation prioritization for effective marine spatial planning. We conducted at-sea visual surveys for seabirds using strip transect methods during spring, summer, and fall in the Northern California Current over 2 years (2022-2024). Using this dataset, we developed density surface models to describe and predict the seasonal distribution and density of the 22 most abundant seabird species. We then applied spatial clustering to identify seasonal hotspots and coldspots of three distinct metrics: (1) seabird density, (2) species diversity, and (3) relative abundance of conservation-priority species. To demonstrate management implications associated with using each of these metrics, we evaluated how hotspots and coldspots overlapped with proposed offshore wind energy areas and seasonal commercial fishing activity. Hotspots and coldspots differed both spatially and seasonally, depending on the metric used to construct them. For example, some locations simultaneously supported a density coldspot and a diversity hotspot, and others were a coldspot for conservation-priority species in spring but a hotspot in summer. Notably, there were no locations where hotspots defined by all three metrics overlapped. Though this study is not an impact assessment, our results have implications for marine spatial planning. In particular, multispecies metrics associated with abundance and diversity may have contrasting implications for spatial management strategies, necessitating careful a priori identification of management objectives. Our study illustrates how hotspots and coldspots can be used to evaluate potential conflicts between marine species and static (offshore wind development areas) and dynamic (seasonal fishing activity) human uses of marine regions. The choice of metrics to define hotspots and coldspots can shape conclusions about conflict or compatibility between species conservation and human use of marine resources.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionBiodiversityBirdsConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsCaliforniaEnvironmental MonitoringSeasonsdensity surface modelsmarine conservationmarine protected areasmarine spatial planningNorthern California Currentseabirdsspatial managementspecies diversity

Identifiers

PMID42851204
PMCPMC13650574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.