ReviewJournal of internal medicine2026
GLP-1 receptor agonists and serious adverse events: Evidence, uncertainty and clinical implications.
Review in Journal of internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists provide benefits in weight reduction, glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Their widespread use has given rise to concerns regarding rare but potentially serious adverse events. This narrative review appraises evidence regarding seven serious adverse events linked to GLP-1 receptor agonists: thyroid cancer, non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION), suicidal behaviours and self-harm, diabetic retinopathy complications, acute pancreatitis, gallbladder and biliary disease and intestinal obstruction. Evidence from mechanistic studies, spontaneous reports, randomized trials and cohort studies is considered. Gallbladder and biliary disease has the most consistent evidence supporting a causal association. Worsening of diabetic retinopathy appears most consistent with early worsening after rapid glycaemic improvement in patients with pre-existing retinopathy. For thyroid cancer, NAION, suicidal behaviour and self-harm, acute pancreatitis and intestinal obstruction, evidence regarding causality remains uncertain. Rare events, incomplete ascertainment in trials and residual confounding in observational studies limit inference. Because these events are rare, even substantial relative risk increases generally correspond to small absolute risk increases in broad populations but may become relevant in patients with high baseline risk. Treatment decisions should consider the strength and uncertainty of safety evidence, individual baseline risk, expected benefits relative to available alternatives and patient preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.