Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42851139›Full record

ReviewJournal of internal medicine2026

GLP-1 receptor agonists and serious adverse events: Evidence, uncertainty and clinical implications.

Peter Ueda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter UedaCentre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3275-8743

Funding

Swedish Society of Medicine, ALF and Karolinska Institutet
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists provide benefits in weight reduction, glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Their widespread use has given rise to concerns regarding rare but potentially serious adverse events. This narrative review appraises evidence regarding seven serious adverse events linked to GLP-1 receptor agonists: thyroid cancer, non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION), suicidal behaviours and self-harm, diabetic retinopathy complications, acute pancreatitis, gallbladder and biliary disease and intestinal obstruction. Evidence from mechanistic studies, spontaneous reports, randomized trials and cohort studies is considered. Gallbladder and biliary disease has the most consistent evidence supporting a causal association. Worsening of diabetic retinopathy appears most consistent with early worsening after rapid glycaemic improvement in patients with pre-existing retinopathy. For thyroid cancer, NAION, suicidal behaviour and self-harm, acute pancreatitis and intestinal obstruction, evidence regarding causality remains uncertain. Rare events, incomplete ascertainment in trials and residual confounding in observational studies limit inference. Because these events are rare, even substantial relative risk increases generally correspond to small absolute risk increases in broad populations but may become relevant in patients with high baseline risk. Treatment decisions should consider the strength and uncertainty of safety evidence, individual baseline risk, expected benefits relative to available alternatives and patient preferences.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHypoglycemic AgentsDiabetic RetinopathyHumansPancreatitisThyroid NeoplasmsGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHypoglycemic Agentsadverse effectadverse outcomesdiabetes mellitusdrugs safetyobesity

Identifiers

PMID42851139
PMCPMC13741813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.