SynthesisCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026
Dynamic Prediction of Clinical Endpoints in Survival Analysis With Machine and Deep Learning: A Systematic Review and Regulatory Perspective.
Synthesis in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dynamic Prediction of Clinical Endpoints in Survival Analysis With Machine and Deep Learning: A Systematic Review and Regulatory Perspective.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of time-to-event outcomes is essential for clinical decision-making and model-informed drug development (MIDD). Conventional survival models may inadequately represent complex longitudinal patient trajectories, time-dependent treatments, and evolving biomarker or pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profiles. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have enabled dynamic survival models that update individualized risk predictions as new longitudinal information becomes available. This report systematically reviews dynamic survival modeling frameworks, including extensions of Cox proportional hazards (CPH) with time-varying covariates, discrete-time landmarking strategies, random survival forests (RSF), and deep learning approaches such as DeepHit, Dynamic-DeepHit, and neural ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Applications span sepsis detection, cancer prognosis, and neurodegenerative disease progression. Dynamic models generally achieved discrimination comparable to or better than static Cox models when longitudinal data were available; however, calibration was rarely reported, external validation was uncommon, and integration of PK/PD features into dynamic survival frameworks remains underexplored. Integrating exposure-response modeling with dynamic ML/DL may advance precision dosing, support adaptive trial design, and enhance translational relevance in pharmaceutical research. Emerging regulatory frameworks, including ICH M15 and FDA draft guidance on artificial intelligence in drug development, further emphasize clearly defined contexts of use, risk-based model assessment, credibility, and transparent reporting. Dynamic prediction at the intersection of ML/DL, PK/PD, and regulatory science represents a promising path toward clinically deployable models to inform drug development and regulatory decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.