Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42850966›Full record

SynthesisCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026

Dynamic Prediction of Clinical Endpoints in Survival Analysis With Machine and Deep Learning: A Systematic Review and Regulatory Perspective.

Xinyi Liu, Shuai Shao, Dorothee Semiond, Malidi Ahamadi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinyi LiuSanofi, Morristown, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8262-4092
Shuai ShaoSanofi, Morristown, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5931-5377
Dorothee SemiondSanofi, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Malidi AhamadiSanofi, Morristown, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3450-2467

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of time-to-event outcomes is essential for clinical decision-making and model-informed drug development (MIDD). Conventional survival models may inadequately represent complex longitudinal patient trajectories, time-dependent treatments, and evolving biomarker or pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profiles. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have enabled dynamic survival models that update individualized risk predictions as new longitudinal information becomes available. This report systematically reviews dynamic survival modeling frameworks, including extensions of Cox proportional hazards (CPH) with time-varying covariates, discrete-time landmarking strategies, random survival forests (RSF), and deep learning approaches such as DeepHit, Dynamic-DeepHit, and neural ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Applications span sepsis detection, cancer prognosis, and neurodegenerative disease progression. Dynamic models generally achieved discrimination comparable to or better than static Cox models when longitudinal data were available; however, calibration was rarely reported, external validation was uncommon, and integration of PK/PD features into dynamic survival frameworks remains underexplored. Integrating exposure-response modeling with dynamic ML/DL may advance precision dosing, support adaptive trial design, and enhance translational relevance in pharmaceutical research. Emerging regulatory frameworks, including ICH M15 and FDA draft guidance on artificial intelligence in drug development, further emphasize clearly defined contexts of use, risk-based model assessment, credibility, and transparent reporting. Dynamic prediction at the intersection of ML/DL, PK/PD, and regulatory science represents a promising path toward clinically deployable models to inform drug development and regulatory decision-making.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDrug DevelopmentEndpoint DeterminationMachine LearningHumansNeoplasmsNeurodegenerative DiseasesPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRandom ForestSepsisSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID42850966
PMCPMC13650409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.