ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Towards a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) for Improving Phonological Processing in Developmental Dyslexia: An Exploratory Study.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Towards a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) for Improving Phonological Processing in Developmental Dyslexia: An Exploratory Study.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have immense potential regarding the provision of therapies for disorders of development, but to date have typically been created for non-linguistic disorders such as ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder). Here, we present a BCI designed to improve linguistic phonological processing during natural speech listening, aimed at participants with developmental dyslexia. Phonological 'deficits' are considered a core feature of dyslexia across languages and are present from infancy in those later diagnosed with dyslexia. Here, a non-invasive EEG-BCI relying on auditory inputs and visual feedback was developed to optimise brain patterns related to phonological development in infants and children. The BCI focused on neural patterns identified using Temporal Sampling theory, which has found the theta/delta ratio during natural speech listening to be a key neural associate of impaired phonology. As a first step, the BCI was tested with adults. Adults with and without dyslexia played the BCI for 16 sessions and received pre- and post-testing regarding phonological awareness and single word and non-word reading skills. Learning was assessed both online, as in most BCI studies, and offline, enabling removal of a greater number of potential EEG artefacts. Significant associations between offline BCI scores (a measure of BCI learning) and improvements in non-word reading were found for all participants who learned the BCI, both dyslexic and control. BCI learning also showed significant associations with improvements in real word reading and amplitude rise time discrimination. The data are interpreted with respect to Temporal Sampling theory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42850796What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.