SynthesisPsychophysiology2026
Variability in Preprocessing and Analysis of the Error-Related Negativity in Adult Response-Conflict Studies: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The analysis of EEG (electroencephalography) data affords many defensible choices, creating substantial researcher degrees of freedom. While stimulus-locked components such as the N400 show wide methodological variability and incomplete reporting, it has been unclear whether this generalizes to the response-locked error-related negativity (ERN). We conducted a PRISMA-guided systematic review of ERN studies published 1995-2025. From a chronologically stratified sample of 202 studies of adults using conventional response-conflict tasks and conventional ERP analyses, we extracted preprocessing and quantification choices, assessed reporting completeness, examined temporal trends, and tested predictors of pipeline decisions (e.g., montage size, amplifier, analysis software, task). ERN pipelines and order of analysis steps were highly heterogeneous, no two studies used the same workflow, and reporting gaps persisted. Several analytic decisions showed modest temporal shifts, yet overall diversity remained high. Sample sizes increased over time but remained insufficient for typical small-to-moderate sized effects, and detailed preregistrations were extremely rare. None of the 32 processing and analysis choices examined in more detail varied systematically by task, and only a subset was linked to recording parameters (e.g., montage size, amplifier, analysis software). Across adult ERN studies using conventional response-conflict tasks and conventional ERP analyses, we observed substantial methodological heterogeneity, limited convergence in analytic practice, and considerable potential for analytic flexibility. Together this may complicate the comparison and synthesis of findings across studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42850767What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.