ArticleThe plant genome2026
Cross-species transcriptomics uncovers shared responses to water deficiency in plants.
Article in The plant genome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-species transcriptomics uncovers shared responses to water deficiency in plants.The plant genome · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deepening our knowledge of conserved molecular mechanisms governing stress responses in plants is fundamental for identifying new core genes and processes involved in tolerance to adverse environmental conditions. For this purpose, we developed a bioinformatic pipeline to retrieve and integrate stress-related RNA-seq transcriptomic data from species of interest and identify core species-specific and cross-species conserved genes and processes involved in stress responses. We utilized this approach to investigate the molecular mechanisms underpinning drought response in Arabidopsis thaliana, Triticum aestivum, and Solanum lycopersicum. We found that hormone signaling, reactive oxygen species catabolism, cell wall organization, photosynthesis, and defense mechanisms were dysregulated in response to drought in at least two species. Among the identified cross-species conserved differentially expressed genes, PUB19, EDL3, RAB18, and AAP6 confirmed to play a key role in drought response. Coexpression networks identified central genes underpinning drought-response, such as HB-7 in leaves and P5CS1 in roots. Leveraging PlantConnectome, several drought-responsive genes not classified as such in Gene Ontology were also detected, including EULS3, PUB19, BFT, DAA1, involved in carbohydrate recognition, ubiquitination, abscisic acid signaling, and membrane integrity maintenance, highlighting the need for further investigation. In conclusion, the developed approach proved effective in identifying core drought-responsive genes and processes and has the potential to be applied to other plant species and types of stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42850733What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.