ArticleThe plant genome2026
Feasibility and pitfalls of combining small subpopulations for genome-wide association analysis of maize (Zea mays L.) kernel traits.
Article in The plant genome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) typically require large populations to achieve sufficient statistical power; however, maintaining large populations is labor-intensive and costly. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of improving GWAS detection power by strategically integrating small maize (Zea mays L.) subpopulations for kernel-related traits. Using high-throughput phenotyping of eight kernel traits, GWAS was conducted across four different population combinations. Expanding population size generally increased single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) association strength and enabled identification of additional loci, supporting the advantage of subpopulation integration. However, some loci identified in smaller combinations lost association strength after incorporating genetically divergent subpopulations, indicating that phenotypic distribution and genetic background strongly influence GWAS outcomes. Comparison with previously reported kernel quantitative trait loci revealed that many identified SNPs reside in multi-trait genomic regions, while several loci exhibited trait-specific effects. Candidate genes within linkage disequilibrium blocks included pentatricopeptide repeat proteins, an insulin-degrading enzyme-like protein, and a peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase, all with plausible roles in kernel development. Collectively, our results suggest that integrating small populations is an effective and practical strategy to enhance GWAS feasibility and locus discovery, while careful consideration of population structure remains essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.