ArticleDiagnostic and prognostic research2026
ACCEPT 3.0: Recalibrating ACute COPD Exacerbation Prediction Tool (ACCEPT) for global use.
Article in Diagnostic and prognostic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe ACute COPD Exacerbation Prediction Tool (ACCEPT) is an algorithm for predicting 12-month risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. To make it suitable for international use, we externally validated and recalibrated ACCEPT 2.0 to incorporate country-specific background exacerbation risk, using multi-country data from NOVELTY (a NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY).
methodsOur study cohort included patients aged [Formula: see text]40 years with physician-diagnosed COPD and [Formula: see text]30 days of follow-up. We predicted the occurrence of any moderate-to-severe (primary endpoint) and severe (secondary) exacerbations at 12 months, using country-level random effects to account for between-country differences in background exacerbation risks unexplained by predictor effects. We assessed model performance via discrimination, calibration, and net benefit.
resultsThe analysis sample comprised 5,181 patients (59.4% male, mean age at baseline 66.5 years) from 18 countries, with a mean follow-up of 357 days. 12-month risks ranged between 0.11 and 0.46 (mean = 0.26) for moderate-to-severe and 0.03-0.21 (mean = 0.08) for severe exacerbations. Without country-level adjustment, ACCEPT 2.0's area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.73 (95% CI 0.72-0.75) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.73-0.78) for moderate-to-severe and severe exacerbations, respectively. However, ACCEPT 2.0 consistently overpredicted risks (observed-to-expected [O/E] risk ratio = 0.57 [95% CI 0.54-0.60] and 0.51 [95% CI 0.46-0.56]). After country-level recalibration, ACCEPT 3.0 showed similar AUROCs (0.75 and 0.76) but substantially improved calibration (O/E ratios: 0.99 [95% CI 0.94-1.05] and 0.99 [95% CI 0.90-1.09]). The net benefit of ACCEPT 3.0 exceeded ACCEPT 2.0 across treatment thresholds of 5%-20%.
conclusionRecalibrating ACCEPT 2.0 with country-level effects significantly improved calibration of COPD exacerbation risks. The resulting ACCEPT 3.0 is expected to provide higher clinical utility across a range of treatment thresholds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42850639What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.