ArticleBMC nursing2026
Why specialize? An exploration of how clinical experience influences students' motivation for specialist nursing education.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExisting research has examined motivation among specialist nursing students and identified factors influencing their pursuit of postgraduate education, including the role of clinical experience. However, it remains unclear whether and how motivation varies with years of clinical experience, and how such differences can be understood from a pedagogical perspective in postgraduate nursing education.
aimTo explore how nurses with different lengths of clinical experience articulate their motivations for pursuing specialist nursing education.
methodsThis study was part of a larger survey examining the effects of clinical experience on self-efficacy, nursing competence, academic performance, and study outcomes among specialist nursing students. This paper presents a qualitative analysis of students' reported motivation to pursue further education, based on qualitative free-text responses. The study used inductive descriptive thematic analysis, supplemented by cross-group comparisons and descriptive quantification of codes to identify patterns across clinical experience length. When interpreting the analysis, the study used Situated Learning theory and the Novice to Expert framework.
resultsA total of 94 students participated. The analysis identified four overarching motivational themes: Professional Role Advancement, Expanded Participation, Contributing to the Improvement of Clinical Practice, and Personal Advantages. Overall, participants described a broad range of motivations for undertaking specialist nursing education, with emphasis across themes varying by group according to length of clinical experience.
conclusionThe findings suggest that length of prior clinical experience may shape not only what students know but also what they seek from formal education and how they engage with new knowledge. Consistent with perspectives on situated learning and the development of nursing expertise, the findings suggest that students' prior experiences and positions in clinical practice may influence how they approach and make sense of further education. For educators, this underscores the importance of not assuming that all students have the same personal goals. Rather, education may serve different purposes for different students, and recognizing these varied orientations may help shape educational environments that respond to students' different starting points and expectations while maintaining shared academic and professional goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.