ReviewChinese medicine2026
Large language models linking traditional Chinese medicine knowledge and clinical practice.
Review in Chinese medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTraditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is a complex medical system characterized by multi-source data, implicit knowledge representation, and syndrome-based diagnostic and therapeutic reasoning. With the increasing digitization of classical texts and clinical records, large language models (LLMs) have attracted growing interest as computational tools for organizing and utilizing knowledge related to TCM. However, existing studies remain scattered, and a comprehensive overview of data resources, modeling strategies, evaluation practices, and application scenarios is still lacking. OVERVIEW: In this review, we summarize current research on the application of LLMs in TCM based on published literature. We focus on commonly used data sources, including classical texts, clinical records, and related structured resources, and review representative modeling approaches such as knowledge-enhanced and multimodal methods. Domain-specific training and fine-tuning strategies, as well as reported evaluation practices, are also summarized. Furthermore, we review representative application scenarios described in the literature, including medical consultation support, syndrome differentiation assistance, prescription-related support, education, and research assistance. Key limitations, such as limited interpretability, safety concerns, and the lack of standardized evaluation frameworks, are discussed.
conclusionBy organizing existing studies along the workflow from data construction to model development, evaluation, and application, this review aims to clarify the current research landscape and highlight methodological challenges that should be addressed to support cautious and appropriate use of LLMs in TCM research and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.