ArticleBMC medical education2026
Enhancing medical students' self-assessed competence in sexually transmitted infections: outcomes of an interdisciplinary workshop on syphilis, stigmatization and sexual history-taking.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSexually transmitted infections (STIs), particularly syphilis, continue to pose a significant public health problem. In addition to medical expertise, communication skills - especially when taking a sexual history - are crucial for providing adequate patient care. Previous studies have shown that medical students often feel uncomfortable and inadequately prepared to take a sexual history.
methodsA pre-post evaluation was conducted as part of a STI workshop for medical students (n = 33). The interdisciplinary workshop consisted of dermatological components (epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of syphilis) and psychological components (stigmatization, self-reflection, and sexual history taking), as well as practical exercises (role-playing exercises to practice taking a medical history based on fictional patient cases and simulation of an intramuscular injection using a model). Data was collected using standardized questionnaires immediately before and after the workshop. In addition to the self-assessment scales, an objective test was undertaken concerning the treatment of syphilis and sexual history taking after the workshop.
resultsThirty-three students participated in the workshop, 31 in the voluntary survey and thus constitute the sample analysed. After the workshop, the students reported a significant increase concerning the self-reported knowledge of epidemiology of syphilis, clinical symptoms, of diagnostic procedures, and of syphilis treatment, as well as in administering an intramuscular injection. Regarding sexual history taking, the students' answers concerning knowledge of the content, confidence while taking a sexual history, and knowledge of relevance of stigmatization increased significantly. Meanwhile, the self-reported embarrassment while taking a sexual history, and the concerns about patients' feelings of stigmatization decreased significantly. Most participants stated that that the workshop should be implemented into the standard curriculum. DISCUSSION: Interdisciplinary teaching formats that combine dermatological and psychological content can help to specifically improve both knowledge and communication skills related to STI care. Teaching these domains together may better prepare medical students for patient-centered sexual healthcare than traditional discipline-specific education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.