ArticleBMC nursing2026
Ethical challenges in medical error disclosure among healthcare professionals in teaching hospitals: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical error disclosure is a fundamental component of patient safety and professional ethics in healthcare systems; however, in practice, it is frequently influenced by individual, organizational, and contextual factors. Although international research has examined issues such as blame culture and psychological safety, an in-depth qualitative understanding of the ethical challenges surrounding medical error disclosure in Iranian teaching hospitals remains limited. PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the ethical challenges of medical error disclosure among healthcare professionals working in Iranian teaching hospitals.
methodsThis qualitative study using an inductive qualitative content analysis approach was conducted in 2025 in teaching hospitals affiliated with Bam University of Medical Sciences. Sixteen healthcare professionals were selected through purposive sampling with maximum variation. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews and analyzed concurrently using the qualitative content analysis approach of Graneheim and Lundman.
findingsData analysis yielded five main themes and 20 categories: conflict between ethical commitment to honesty and perceived organizational insecurity; blame-oriented organizational responses and the suppression of learning; selective concealment and informal management of errors as protective responses; psychological and moral burden following error experiences; and structural and relational conditions shaping error disclosure. Overall, participants described error disclosure as a context-dependent ethical process shaped by the interaction of professional commitment, organizational insecurity, managerial responses, and broader structural conditions.
conclusionMedical error disclosure emerged as a complex, context-dependent ethical process embedded within organizational and relational contexts rather than an isolated individual decision. The findings highlight the importance of fostering Just Culture and psychological safety to support transparent error disclosure and organizational learning in Iranian teaching hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42850605What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.