SynthesisBMC public health2026
Physical education-embedded fitness-oriented exercise interventions for youth physical fitness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhysical fitness in children and adolescents is an important outcome of school health promotion. Previous reviews have often combined physical education, recess, after-school programmes, and whole-school strategies, making it difficult to determine whether embedded fitness-oriented content improves multidimensional physical fitness. This study evaluated the effects of physical education-embedded fitness-oriented exercise interventions on physical fitness in general populations of children and adolescents.
methodsThe initial systematic search was completed on March 11, 2026, in PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, Cochrane Library/CENTRAL, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-randomized controlled trials (cRCTs) conducted among children and adolescents in general schools were included. Interventions were fitness-oriented exercise content embedded within regular physical education lessons, warm-ups, or main lesson components; comparators were regular physical education, usual school physical activity, usual warm-up, or wait-list control. Outcomes were lower-limb explosive power, muscular endurance, speed, agility, and flexibility. Hedges g was pooled using random-effects models. Effective sample size correction was applied to cRCTs that did not adequately account for clustering. RoB 2 and GRADE were used to assess risk of bias and certainty of evidence.
resultsFormal search updates and targeted supplementary searches identified 7,875 records. After deduplication and removal of overlaps between search sources, 4,724 records entered title and abstract screening. Finally, 54 reports representing 51 independent studies were included in the systematic review, and 49 studies entered the primary arm-level Hedges g meta-analysis. The primary analysis showed favourable average effects for lower-limb explosive power (Hedges g = 0.260, 95% CI 0.081 to 0.438), muscular endurance (g = 0.396, 95% CI 0.237 to 0.554), agility (g = 0.494, 95% CI 0.151 to 0.837), and flexibility (g = 0.505, 95% CI 0.106 to 0.905), with 95% CIs not crossing the line of no effect. Speed also showed a favourable direction, but the 95% CI crossed the line of no effect (g = 0.198, 95% CI - 0.127 to 0.522). The certainty of evidence was low for muscular endurance and very low for the other four outcomes.
conclusionsLow- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests that physical education-embedded fitness-oriented exercise interventions may have small favourable effects on some physical fitness outcomes in children and adolescents. Given the risk of bias, heterogeneity, imprecision, and small-study effects or funnel plot asymmetry signals in some outcomes, the current results should not be interpreted as definitive evidence of effectiveness. These interventions may represent a low-additional-time pathway for improving the quality of fitness stimuli within existing physical education lessons, but current evidence remains insufficient to support strong practice recommendations.
trial registrationSystematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD420261356863.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.