Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42850603›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Public awareness and knowledge of antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance in Malta.

Gavin Schranz, Vanessa Camilleri, Monique Sciortino, Michael A Borg, Ermira Tartari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gavin SchranzUniversity of Malta, Msida Campus, Msida, MSD2080, Malta. gavin.schranz.17@um.edu.mt.
Vanessa CamilleriUniversity of Malta, Msida Campus, Msida, MSD2080, Malta.
Monique SciortinoUniversity of Malta, Msida Campus, Msida, MSD2080, Malta.
Michael A BorgUniversity of Malta, Msida Campus, Msida, MSD2080, Malta.
Ermira TartariUniversity of Malta, Msida Campus, Msida, MSD2080, Malta.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global threat, driven partly by inappropriate antibiotic use. Understanding public knowledge, awareness, and behaviours is critical for designing effective interventions. This study assessed these dimensions within the Maltese population to inform national AMR awareness and stewardship strategies.

methodA cross-sectional online survey was conducted between 9 and 29 April 2024 among Maltese residents using a questionnaire adapted from the World Health Organization (WHO) Antibiotic Resistance Multi-Country Public Awareness Survey. A convenience sampling approach with active demographic monitoring was used across gender, age, and education groups, using census-derived targets as benchmarks. The survey, available in English and Maltese, assessed knowledge of appropriate antibiotic use, awareness of AMR-related terminology, and attitudes towards antibiotic use and resistance. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis H, Chi-Square, Likelihood Ratio) to explore associations between demographic factors and knowledge or behavioural outcomes.

resultsA total of 476 eligible respondents completed the survey and were included in the analysis. Among respondents, 59.9% were female and the largest age group was 25-34 years (31.9%). Awareness of "antibiotic resistance" was high (88%) yet understanding of "antimicrobial resistance" (48%) and its abbreviation "AMR" (21%) was lower. Most participants (97%) agreed that antibiotics should only be used when prescribed, but misconceptions persisted: 16.6% believed antibiotics treat colds and flu, 33.6% for fever, and 39.9% for sore throats. Three-quarters (75%) incorrectly attributed resistance to the body becoming resistant rather than bacteria. Older and more educated respondents showed significantly better knowledge and more appropriate attitudes (p < 0.05), whereas younger adults and males were more likely to hold misconceptions. While nearly all respondents (96.7%) agreed that individuals should use antibiotics responsibly, fewer (53.4%) viewed AMR as a major global challenge or expressed personal concern (67.2%) about its impact, and one-third believed they were not at risk if they used antibiotics correctly. Findings indicate general awareness but persistent conceptual and demographic gaps.

conclusionDespite high awareness of appropriate antibiotic use, misconceptions about treatment indications and the mechanisms of AMR remain, particularly among younger adults and those with lower education. Improving public understanding of when antibiotics are needed and how resistance develops will be critical to promoting responsible use. These findings provide locally generated evidence to inform targeted public health communication and support AMR prevention efforts in Malta.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug Resistance, MicrobialHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMaltaMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic misuseAntimicrobial resistancePatient education

Identifiers

PMID42850603
PMCPMC13647623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.