ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Regional corneal epithelial thickness and asymmetry patterns in early keratoconus versus regular astigmatism using MS-39 anterior segment OCT: a comparative cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo compare corneal epithelial thickness (CET) profiles among different types of regular astigmatism and early keratoconus (KCN) using the MS-39 anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and to identify disease-specific epithelial asymmetry patterns, regional epithelial thickness, and ROC performance.
methodsThis comparative cross-sectional study included 96 eyes from 55 participants: with-the-rule astigmatism (WTR, n = 34), against-the-rule astigmatism (ATR, n = 19), oblique astigmatism (OBL, n = 13), and early keratoconus (KCN, n = 30). Corneal epithelial thickness maps and central corneal thickness (CCT) were obtained with the MS-39 AS-OCT. Because some participants contributed both eyes and group sizes were unequal, eye-level comparisons used participant-clustered robust standard errors. Multivariable models additionally adjusted for age, sex, cylinder power, and CCT. ROC 95% confidence intervals were estimated by participant-level cluster bootstrap.
resultsRegular astigmatic eyes showed the expected superior-to-inferior epithelial thickness gradient, whereas early KCN eyes showed relative superior epithelial thickening and attenuation of this gradient. CCT was lower in early KCN than in regular astigmatism (499.9 ± 29.3 μm vs. 555.7 ± 39.5 μm; P < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, cylinder power, and CCT, superior epithelial thickness remained greater in early KCN in the 2-5 mm annulus (adjusted B = + 2.78 μm; 95% CI, 1.15 to 4.41; P < 0.001) and 5-7 mm annulus (B = + 3.17 μm; 95% CI, 1.30 to 5.04; P < 0.001). The superior-inferior difference in the 2-5 mm zone also remained attenuated (B = + 2.10 μm; 95% CI, 0.51 to 3.68; P = 0.010). Superior ET at 2-5 mm had an AUC of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.62-0.87); a combined epithelial model yielded an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.67-0.90).
conclusionsEarly KCN showed region-specific epithelial thickness differences characterized by relative superior epithelial thickening and attenuation of the normal vertical epithelial gradient. These differences persisted after adjustment for overall CCT, suggesting that the principal findings were not explained solely by differences in total corneal thickness. Diagnostic performance was moderate, so epithelial mapping should be considered an adjunct to established tomographic assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42850600What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.