Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42850597›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2026

Letting patients lead? Practitioners' experiences of using DIALOG+ in psychosis outpatient care - patient involvement, collaborative dynamics, and professional roles.

Marcus Lundmark, Matilda Cederberg, Ann-Christine Andersson, Andreas Gremyr

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marcus LundmarkDepartment of Psychotic Disorders, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. marcus.lundmark@vgregion.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7535-1502
Matilda CederbergDepartment of Psychotic Disorders, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4727-9638
Ann-Christine AnderssonThe Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0409-1985
Andreas GremyrDepartment of Psychotic Disorders, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6153-2957

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere mental illness, such as psychosis, significantly affects many areas of life. Involving patients in their care may enhance engagement and support recovery by ensuring that treatment focuses on their expressed needs. DIALOG+ is an intervention, supported by a digital tool, aimed at facilitating patient involvement in treatment by incorporating self-assessment and a problem-solving approach during routine clinical encounters and promoting a collaborative and patient-centred approach to care. The aim of this study was to explore mental health practitioners' (MHPs) experiences of how DIALOG+ influenced patient involvement and the dynamics of collaboration in outpatient psychosis care.

methodsA qualitative study was designed to describe MHPs' experiences of using DIALOG+ in psychosis outpatient care in Sweden. Fourteen MHPs who had used DIALOG+ three times or more were included in the study. Four focus groups were conducted using semi-structured interviews and analysed through reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsThe analysis of MHPs' experiences resulted in three themes: "The patient's voice and engagement," "The relationship between patient and mental health practitioner," and "Professional challenges and changes in the practitioner's role." DIALOG+'s structured approach made it easier for patients to express their needs and take a more active role in the conversation, sometimes leading to increased patient engagement. The intervention also seemed to balance the conversation by sharing responsibility for decisions and follow-up between patients and practitioners. At the same time, practitioners reflected on challenges when letting the patient lead the conversation, which could result in time constraints and the need to balance patient-led agendas with professional responsibility.

conclusionDIALOG+ has the potential to support the operationalisation of co-production in outpatient psychosis care by increasing patients' influence over the agenda in routine clinical encounters. It provides a structured framework for shared reflection and action planning, while also making visible potential differences between patients' preferences and practitioners' clinical assessments that can be negotiated. However, its impact depends on how the approach is enacted in practice. Supporting practitioners in navigating shifts in professional roles and authority may therefore be important for realising the full potential of the intervention.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAttitude of Health PersonnelPatient ParticipationProfessional RolePsychotic DisordersAdultCommunicationCooperative BehaviorFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePhysician-Patient RelationsProfessional-Patient RelationsCo-productionDIALOG+Patient participationPerson-centred careProfessional-patient relationsPsychotic disordersQualitative researchSchizophrenia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.